Home|GrowerTalks|Green Profit|Ball Publishing|Ball Bookshelf
Friday, April 28, 2017


Also in this issue...

01 |Digital Edition
02 |GT in Brief
03 |SAF in the Lobby
04 |New Products
05 |New Products Submissions


06 |Classifieds
07 |Request Product Info
08 |Article Archive
09 |Acres Online
10 |GreenTalks
11 |Inside Grower
12 |Nursery & Landscape Insider
13 |Perennial Pulse
14 |NewTerrain
15 |Trade Show Calendar
16 |Subscriptions
17 |Hard Goods Distributors
18 |Media Kit 2017


Featured Companies

DANZIGER "DAN" FLOWER FARM
BIOSAFE SYSTEMS
SB MACHINERIE
ARGUS CONTROL SYSTEMS LTD.
H.E. ANDERSON COMPANY
NEXUS GREENHOUSE CORP.
ATLAS MANUFACTURING INC.
BEAVER PLASTICS
STAR ROSES AND PLANTS
SAKATA
>> See All

 


Study Clears Bayer
Share on Facebook

In another article by Bloomberg Business, it was announced that researchers at the University of Maryland concluded their three-year study on the effects of imidacloprid on bee colonies and found "imidicloprid, when applied at 'realistic' levels, doesn't harm honey bee colonies." The scientists state that "it contributes, but there is a bigger picture." This study clears Bayer's insecticide as the "sole cause of CCD" and is another small victory. You can read the full article here.

Reader Comments (3)


I must be on the emailing list of every environmental organization out there, and for good reason: I've been seriously concerned about a broad range of environmental issues since the mid 1970's. But never once did I sign on in the frenzy over neonics, believing, accurately as it turned out, that the science wasn't in yet, and that we simply didn't know what all the true factors were. And further, it bothered me greatly that so many activists in this issue seemed to have just learned that pesticides were used on the myriad crops and products when the neonic implication got proposed. That is, they seemed woefully ignorant about the effects of older chemistries, things like organophosphates and carbamates. All that siad, one of my biggest fears coming out of this situation is that numerous other, credible and legitimate environmental efforts will now be discredited as this one is shown to have been wide of the mark. That would be a true tragedy, in a world where nature is being beaten up every hour of every day.

But I am hopeful that at least for coscientious growers, the tools offered by neonic chemistry will remain in the toolbox. And further, I hope the industry itself will self-police such that these products are not used in situations where insect-pollinated plants are treated sufficiently close to their respective time of flowering, leading to bee and other insect deaths.
Friday, March 27, 2015 | Thomas Duffey


Sadly , the anti science bias will prevent many people from believing this and they will continue to excoriate the chemicals without fact. This will prevent progress and the finding of a cure for CCD
Friday, March 27, 2015 | Joel Pesapane


On Joel's comment. I don't think its an "anti-science bias" that is really driving people to be skeptical about studies. Its when science is used and manipulated by people or organizations that have an inbuilt agenda that drives people to be skeptical about science and 'studies'.

It might be a corporation, an advocacy group, or even academics (with an education that say 'this is the way things are'...and who are you with your crazy theory). Its certainly the media (looking for a sexy story and ignoring the details of the study). Its politicians with a pet project and an audience to pander to.

When International Widgets funds a 'science study' that finds that widgets reduce heart disease and increases the sex drive, the public is right to be skeptical. And when the government gives money to increase exports of widgets we right to roll our eyes.

When governments allow industries to self-regulate, we don't trust.

When regulators neglect their responsibilities, we don't trust.

When groups directly fund their own science, we don't trust.

When politicians pander to money and elections, we don't trust.

When trust is betrayed over and over we do the only thing that seems rational. We don't trust. I do 'trust' science, as far as that goes. But that does not seem to go very far these days.

Well. thats a bit of a rant. I hope its not too much, but 4 out of 5 doctors recommend a rant a week. ;)
Friday, March 27, 2015 | rob mills


Post a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

* Your Name:  

* Comment:  


* Enter Words:  

Comment Moderation Enabled
Your comment will not appear until it has been approved by a website editor.




© Copyright 2001 - 2017 Ball Horticultural Company  — About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions